Studying Presidential Leadership in Adverse Times

Analyzing four different presidents and the styles of leadership they applied.

Studying Presidential Leadership in Adverse Times

Leadership, particularly presidential leadership, has been a topic of great interest to me for years. I have asked myself: What makes a president a great leader? What kind of leader makes the best president? What did the presidents remembered for being great leaders have that others did not? What life events molded them? I began reading historian Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book Leadership in Turbulent Times just as I was wrapping up a course in my graduate studies on leadership; the timing could not have been more perfect for me.

In this book, Goodwin looks at four presidents, the presidents she has researched extensively in her brilliant career, and examines their development into great leaders by asking herself the same questions I posed. Each individual story has its dramatic ups and downs, yet each man was defined by a raw sense of, not only ambition, but a call to do what was right and to be of service to others. This article will be a brief summary of the crises that Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, and Lyndon Johnson faced and how they applied traits of different styles of leadership to confront them.

The Transformational Leader: Abraham Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation

 “Every man is said to have a peculiar ambition. I have no other so great as that of being truly esteemed of my fellow man.”

When Lincoln presented the Emancipation Proclamation to his Cabinet in July 1862, he informed them that he would listen to their ideas and opinions, but he would not change his mind about what must be done. As a transformational leader, regardless of inside and outside critics, Lincoln kept his word on delivering this unprecedented Proclamation. In September, he announced the Emancipation Proclamation would be activated by the first day of the new year. As that day approached and the public doubted this would happen, Lincoln and those close to him, including Frederick Douglass, knew that to keep his word was to keep his honor. To Lincoln, honor was everything. Abraham Lincoln put the interest of the whole nation at the forefront, and when it came to the enacting the Emancipation Proclamation, he was taking a moral stand for all generations, past and present. He transformed the minds of many who opposed the historic step, and he was willing to bend to produce action. When Lincoln signed the Proclamation on January 1, 1863, he said, “I never, in my life, felt more certain I was doing right, than I do in signing this paper. If my name ever goes down in history it will be for this act, and my whole soul is in it.”

After Lincoln was elected to a second term, the Thirteenth Amendment (abolishing slavery and involuntary servitude, except for punishment for committing a crime) was passed, and Lincoln’s dreams were realized. Just over three months later he was assassinated. His life, the triumphs, the tragedies, accomplishments, and failures, had transformed him and made him a leader like few others, but more importantly, he transformed the lives of millions of others through this act of leadership.

An Example of Crisis Leadership: Theodore Roosevelt and the Great Coal Strike

“When I went into politics. I was not conscious of going in with the purpose to benefit other people but of getting for myself a privilege to which I was entitled in common with other people.”              

There was no president more bombastic a figure than TR. He overcame crippling asthma as a child and led the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War; he relished a good fight. TR’s crisis highlighted in this book is the Great Coal Strike of 1902 between the United Mine Workers and the strong coalition of railroad chiefs and mine owners who dominated the hard coal production. The decision to intervene in this crippling strike was a difficult conclusion for Roosevelt to come to, he was advised it would be better for him politically to stay out of this situation when it arose in May; let management and labor work it out on their own. But as months went by and the problems only mounted, that option was less and less likely and Roosevelt requested his own reports to gather reliable facts of the situation. During that tense summer, TR looked to history for answers, and he found guidance in a biography on Lincoln.

 He waited until public sentiment had grown to the point of exhaustion to speak out on the crisis, and then, with no constitutional duty, decided to act. TR was not the type of man to sit around idly while millions were being impacted by this coal strike. He formed the most competent crisis management team and summoned the union president and presidents of the anthracite coal companies to the White House, making it the first time corporate and union leaders were called to discuss issues in person with the president. After arguments and arbitration, the strike ended after more than 160 days thanks to the skillful leadership of Theodore Roosevelt. The Great Coal Strike of 1902 marked the beginning of TR’s quest in restraining the corporate wealth that had exploded during the Industrial Revolution; an era of extensive progressive reform was born out of these 6 tumultuous months.

The Turnaround Leader: FDR and The First 100 Days

“The country needs and, unless I mistake its temper, the country demands bold, persistent experimentation. It is common sense to take a method and try it: if it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something.”                            

Franklin Roosevelt inherited the second worst disaster in this nation’s history when he took the oath of office in March of 1933. It was the Great Depression: banks had collapsed, people were out of jobs and homes, they could not afford to feed children, and the relief funds were depleted; it was the worst of times. FDR had turned his own life around after being crippled by polio at the age of 39, now it was time for him to do the same for the country. His “New Deal” had a three-step approach that sounds much simpler than it was. First, the feeling of panic had to be stopped in order to make any recovery, then, a plan to counter the financial collapse needed to be enacted, and finally, the economic and social structure needed reformation. Although the Depression would not come to an end until the onset of World War II, the First 100 Days set in motion that three-step recovery plan and boosted the morale of the country.

From his empathetic and motivational inaugural address which squashed fear and reassured Americans of the plentiful resources still available, to his first fireside chat after closing the banks, and onto the end of the 100 days in mid-June, FDR proved time and again that he was the leader the country needed. During those couple of months, he persuaded Americans to put their trust back in the banks and created programs such as the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Works Progress Administration, both of which put millions of Americans to useful work. FDR never took solitary credit for these achievements, he praised the teamwork that had crossed party lines and the cooperation that existed between the legislative and executive branches. FDR was the great communicator, reaching and calming the worries and fears of millions of Americans. By mastering the radio, he was able to convey a common mission, earn the trust of the people, and mobilize them towards a common cause. The connection between the president and the people was the quintessential quality of FDR, the turnaround leader.

A Visionary Leader: Lyndon Johnson and Civil Rights

“Ambition is an uncomfortable companion. He creates a discontent with present surroundings and achievements: he is never satisfied but always pressing forward.”                      

Few men had mastered the operations of the legislative process like LBJ had, and from the moment he became president on that horrific November day in 1963, he knew exactly how he was going to use his powers to pass domestic legislation he viewed as crucial. The chief piece of legislation he wanted to see pass was a civil rights act. What better way to attract attention to the issue than delivering a speech at a Joint Session of Congress and then through a televised address explaining why the late President Kennedy’s domestic agenda needed to be passed and how this would honor his memory. By making this call to action and to prove to the world that America will move forward, he was emulating his own hero: FDR. The fight to get the civil rights bill passed in the House and Senate was no easy task, even with Johnson’s persuasive stories about the racism personal African American friends of his had experienced and with his firm statements to Southern senators, particularly Richard Russell, that if they struck down this bill, he would end their careers.

Still, Johnson recognized the importance of reaching across the aisle to get Republican votes in order to survive Russell’s filibuster. He told Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois that if he voted in favor of this bill, his and Lincoln’s name would be the two most memorable from that state; history would be on his side. In the final hours before the June 10th vote before the Senate, the president was making phone calls to senators from western states asking for their help and explaining the historical significance of it. The lobbying paid off and on July 2, 1964, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. His vision did not end there, after a landslide win in 1964 that gave the Democrats control of the House and Senate, he went on and passed a herd of progressive legislation that would become a part of his Great Society. When he signed the Voting Rights Act in August 1965, it had been just over 600 days since Kennedy’s death. Although his legacy would be tainted by Vietnam, there is no denying the impact Johnson’s legislation had on millions of Americans, the greatest advancement in civil rights since Lincoln. Johnson had a vision, a plan, and a team, but only certain men such as himself could successfully implement these visions and change the course of American history.

Conclusion

None of these four men were perfect, as history has shown and will continue to show, and some are more revered than others. After I finished the book, I felt optimistic that there are many individuals who do have these styles of leadership in their DNA, and I was encouraged by the fact it is also never too late to learn and acquire these skills. Each of these presidents evolved into strong leaders over the course of their life in public service, and they all offer a source of inspiration to us in this present turbulent time.

To learn more about these presidents, their evolution as leaders, and the turbulent times in which they led, I highly recommend Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Leadership in Turbulent Times (2018), published by Simon & Schuster.

About the Author 

Holley Snaith is an experienced writer and historian who has worked with the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt sites in New York and the Richard Nixon Foundation in California. There she conducted extensive research on various topics and worked with the nonprofit fundraising side. A graduate of the University of Florida with a degree in History, she is currently pursuing her Master’s in Public Administration.

What's Your Opinion?